| 請尊重及感激所有版主付出和奉獻 | 尊貴會員無限看帖不用回覆 | 你準備好成為出色的版主了嗎？ |
| 其他運動討論 | 足球討論 | 單車討論 | 籃球討論 | 田徑討論 | 棒球討論 | 羽毛球討論 | 乒乓球討論 |
| 撞球(桌球)討論 | 健身運動討論 | 武術討論 | 爬山及遠足討論 | 瑜伽討論 | 排球討論 | 網球/壁球討論 | 高爾夫球討論 |
| 職業摔角討論 | 潛水討論 | ||||||
6115| 0 |    [NBA]Irving、Thomas 球員交易案 (集中討論帖) |
|
| 若瀏覽伊莉的時侯發生問題或不正常情況，請使用Internet Explorer(I.E)。
點評 visit999 not counting on IT. Note they played well in Playoff even w/o IT vs Cavs. The only game they won (game3) was w/o IT. Celtics played tough defense, great ball passing & it's a whole team work!
visit999 If IT+Johnson were traded for KI last season, Celtics wouldn't make it that far into the playoff? I disagree. Johnson had no use & KI is at least as good as IT for them. Celtics' plays are really no
 eatfresh IT's value is still at high point consider what BOS got him for. If they sell IT in the middle of last season, BOS probably won't make it that far into the playoff.
visit999 When I said 1 for 1 trade, salaries were ignored, it'd have been IT + a player (e.g. Johnson) for KI. But now they have to also throw in Crowder+Zizic+ a very valuable Nets' pick.
visit999 You call this "賣在高點"? If they traded him past season, that'd be true (it'd have been a 1 for 1 trade, KI for IT). Now IT is injured & his weakness exposed in the playoff...
| |
狗仔卡
重要聲明：本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作，對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等，不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見，並非本網站之立場，用戶不應信賴內容，並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下，用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限，故不能完全監察所有留言，若讀者發現有留言出現問題，請聯絡我們。有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言，同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿上傳和撰寫 侵犯版權(未經授權)、粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論，敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。